Table 1.
P and S Reading Uncertainties Assessed by Comparing Independent Picks of the Same Arrival
Uncertainties |
|||
Data Type |
Impulsive (P phase /S phase), s |
Unreporteda (P phase /S phase), s |
Emergent (P phase /S phase), s |
Local, IGNb and IAGc |
0.2/1.0d |
0.4d/- |
0.4/0.8 |
Local, CNCPRSTe |
0.5/0.8 |
0.8d/0.7 |
0.8/0.7 |
Local, Mohammed Vf |
0.4/0.8 |
0.4/0.8 |
0.4/0.8 |
Teleseism, IGN and IAG |
0.3 |
0.3 |
- |
Teleseism, CNCPRSTg |
0.3 |
0.6 |
- |
aPhase not reported as either impulsive or emergent.
bInstituto Geografico Nacional, Madrid, Spain.
cInstituto Andaluz de Geofisica, Granada, Spain.
dLimited data.
eCentre National de Coordination et de Planification de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, Rabat, Morocco.
fPhysique du Globe, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
gTeleseismic residuals for stations IFR, TAF, and RBA were found to be particularly scattered, hence arrivals reported to these stations were assigned an increased reading uncertainty (1 s).